Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6552 14
Original file (NR6552 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

ARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECOF

 

   

nae
io

70 SUITE 1001

   

   

 

 

Dear
Thiec i wour annlicratior . sate Ae f ‘
TALS s YOUr application C Ci y if

       

  

   

1 a Y rd and
e il Tele - he - =
‘ In ad tt ird

   

   

cons 3 dered

   

 

N130C2/15UC of which v provided t

     

 

 

Yr at icat mn Has
Cl Wel Wil De

 

that the c

cannot be

  
       

 

syed
rea

a+
Docket

probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Enclosure: OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C2/15U0159 dtd 5 Feb 1

No.

5

NR6552

14

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3471 14

    Original file (NR3471 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR COR! TION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket ! NR32471-14 24 Maz E This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552 A three-member panel of g in executive ses c 5 Your all rdance with admini oO e Yy considere ri y Lon 1 shed by OCNO memo N130C2/15U1 i ( ry 2015 copy of which iis ee Arter ana conscientious considerati Che ¢€ re recora C...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6796 14

    Original file (NR6796 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100° Vio ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RE Ref 2) Title LO U.S.C Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments 2} OCNO memc - N130C2/15U0164 dtd 5 Feb (3) Subject’s naval record Documentary m es, nave- cons f the Q a ) y Docket No. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's proceedings in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7189 14

    Original file (NR7189 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C2/15U0151 dated 5 February 2015, a copy of which was provided to you on 7 February 2015, and is being provided to you now. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4191 13

    Original file (NR4191 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 December 2013. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP Memo 7220 Ser N130C2/13U0816 dated 16 September 2013, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5674 14

    Original file (NR5674 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. NR5674-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3218 14

    Original file (NR3218 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application cn 9 March 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7386 14

    Original file (NR7386 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 April 2015. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of Docket No.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08414-07

    Original file (08414-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    8414-07 11 Dec 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 05716-07

    Original file (05716-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N13OC1/07U0591, of 10 August 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3771 14

    Original file (NR3771 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    NR3771-14 22 Dec 14 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner did not have a break in service or changed his Place Entered Active Duty (PLEAD) from 2. The Board, consisting...